One of Britain’s leading agricultural scientists fears we may be entering a new dark age. Professor Maurice Moloney – director of Rothamsted Research – is worried by green activist threats to trash a trial plot of GM wheat at the Hertfordshire research site. “We face the destruction of a technology that could not just help wheat production in Britain,” he says, “but could boost crop yields elsewhere in the world.”

 

Down here in Candleford we take a rather different view. We think that if there’s a new dark age being ushered in, it’s because of the decisions made by Prof Moloney and the BBSRC – the funding body that appointed him. Rothamsted’s chief responsibility is to conduct research aimed at improving our food security. Britain already has a secure food production system – it’s called the mixed farm. It’s capable of producing large amounts of healthy food through biological processes. And it has an inbuilt resilience to climate change by virtue of its biological diversity.

 

A World Bank-funded study by more than 400 scientists around the world concluded that diverse farming systems like UK mixed farming were the most secure and effective way to feed the world, now and in the future (IAASTD, 2008). You might think –as we do – that a leading research station concerned with food security would concentrate its energies on understanding and refining this established model. But under Professor Moloney, the scientists seem content to gamble our food security on an unproven and potentially unstable technology.

 

The 20th century scientist George Stapledon – a strong advocate of mixed farming – warned that for farm science to concentrate on a few narrow technologies was to court disaster. In an address to the British Grassland Society more than fifty years ago he wrote: “Man in putting all his money on narrow specialisation and on the newly-dawned age of technology has backed a wild horse. Given its head it is bound to get out of control.

 

“With science delving into ever more abstruse fields, so will the danger of unexpected ‘ignorances’ become increasingly threatening. These will be of much greater significance in the biological fields than in physics and engineering. I have been forced to realise to the depth of my being that facts and factors mean precisely nothing. It is their mass inter-relationships and interactions that mean everything. And these, for all practical purposes, are infinite.”

 

Prof Moloney is a narrow technologist – a plant biotechnologist. As head of cell biology at Calgene Inc, he developed the first GM oilseed plants. The work resulted in a landmark patent in plant biotechnology and eventually became the basis of Roundup Ready and Liberty Link gene patents, which now account for 85 per cent of Canada’s Canola aceage. Moloney is an inventor on 43 US patents and more than 300 patents world-wide. He is also founder of SemBioSys, a Calgary-based biotech company which helps food and pharmaceutical corporations profit from the products of GM crops.

 

In short, Prof Moloney perfectly represents the narrow and high-risk technological approach to biology that Stapledon warned of. He also seems to be in the business of privatising nature and bringing the world’s food supply under the control of large corporations. The parallels with the global banking system – with its reckless trading of complex derivatives – is alarming.

 

Down here we’re baffled that such a narrow technical specialist should have been put in charge of research into securing our food supply. Where is the knowledge of soil biology on which civilization depends? Where is the understanding of agriculture, the 10,000 years of human learning and experience which has got us to where we are today? And what blind faith in technology induced the BBSRC to make this appointment and stake our future on this unwise experiment?

 

Down here in Candleford we await the answers. But one thing we’re already sure of. If this new technology should fail us in ways we cannot anticipate because – as Stapledon says – the interactions of biological factors are for all practical purposes infinite, we shall indeed be on the eve of a new Dark Age.

 

Welcome to Graham Harvey’s Quest for Real Food

Their emissions are said to threaten the planet. The foods they produce are claimed to endanger health. But have we got it wrong about cattle? Far from damaging health, grassland and grazing animals may be the key to a better environment and a secure supply of healthy, nutritious food. Read more…

Not once in all the furore over the proposed mega dairy in Lincolnshire do I recall any debate about the health implications for us consumers. Though nutritionists don’t know it, the nutrients in milk are partly determined by what the cow’s fed on. That’s why if good health is high on your family’s agenda, you’ll want to make sure the milk, butter and cheese they eat comes from cows grazing fresh green pasture. Not from cows fed on grain in sheds. Read more…

Meet Dr Hans Herren, one of the world’s top scientists on food and development. While based in Benin he developed a biological pest control system that secured the African cassava crop and saved an estimated 20 million people from starvation. So why is the report he co-chaired on world hunger being sidelined by the scientific and farming establishment? I met him in London to find out. Read More…

For years we’ve been told that fatty foods are bad for us. Even foods like beef and butter that humans have been eating for centuries. We’re advised to eat more starchy foods and low-fat products. In effect this means we all eat more processed foods than we used to. Now the official line is coming under attack. A small but growing band of experts say it’s processed carbohydrates and low-fat foods that are killing us. The new “healthy options” are traditional animal foods, particularly when they’re from animals reared on pasture. Read more…

If you eat dairy foods or red meat, there’s only one thing you need to know. And it’s the one thing the supermarkets don’t tell you. Click here to discover the question you need to ask. Read more…

Should supermarket food come with a Government health warning? Two-thirds of the foods on sale are processed, making them, in the view of experts, a cause of ill health. Most of the fresh foods are from chemically-damaged soils or from animals crowded into factories and fed the wrong diet. Foods like this aren’t likely to make you feel good. Fortunately there’s a better, more modern way to shop – especially if you live anywhere near Stevenage. Read more…

 

Graham Harvey Quest for Real Food

Pasture Promise TV

Graham is co-founder of Pasture Promise TV, an internet site dedicated to healthier food, sustainable farming, biodiversity and a vibrant, prosperous countryside. Catch up on our latest film at www.pasturepromise.tv

 

Sign up for Quest updates

Download Graham's latest book
carbon fields book
What is Real Food
Graham Harvey's Blog

Vinnie doesn’t know what’s good for him

Expect to see screen hard-man Vinnie Jones in press ads and on the side of buses any day now. The star of “Gone in 60 seconds”....
no comments

Yellow spring

Here’s a couple of photos I took near my home in west Somerset. Quite pretty you may think. Sadly, for me they represent ill-hea....
no comments
More